<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Philosophy on stau.space</title><link>https://stau.space/tags/philosophy/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy on stau.space</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><managingEditor>sona@stau.space (Sona Tau Estrada Rivera)</managingEditor><webMaster>sona@stau.space (Sona Tau Estrada Rivera)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:11:58 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stau.space/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Eq</title><link>https://stau.space/posts/eq/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:11:58 -0400</pubDate><author>sona@stau.space (Sona Tau Estrada Rivera)</author><guid>https://stau.space/posts/eq/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First, I&amp;rsquo;d like to start with a quick sentence a friend said a really long time ago while we were taking Calculus I:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A set is just its cardinality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At first, my reaction was to dismiss that as nonsense.
I mean, look at these sets: $\{1\}$, $\{2\}$.
They look very different to me, but their cardinality is the same.
You mean to tell me that I can uniquely identify sets by their cardinality?
I&amp;rsquo;ll cut the sarcasm now; yes you can do that identification and it&amp;rsquo;s actually not that crazy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>